The BJP on Monday called for abandoning the pre-Independence, bi-annual practice of 'darbar move', under which the Jammu and Kashmir government functions six months each in the two capitals -- Srinagar and Jammu.
The stand of the BJP, a ruling coalition partner in Jammu and Kashmir, may trigger a major controversy in the state
Seconded by Speaker
J&K Assembly Speaker Kavinder Gupta of the BJP and party spokesman Virendra Gupta called for a “bifurcation of the offices”.
“The practice of the darbar move should be abandoned. There should be a bi-
furcation of the State offices,” Mr. Virendra Gupta said.
Costly for the State
His demand was seconded by the Speaker, who said the practice was “costly for the State exchequer”.
“It was a compulsion in the past because of poor means of transportation and
communication,” the Speaker said.
State BJP president Sat Sharma, however, said this was not the party’s stand but
the view of only the two senior party leaders.
It’s not for the first time that the darbar move, introduced by Maharaja Gulab
Singh in 1872, has come under criticism.
In 2012, the then Chief Minister Omar Abdullah had raised questions on the
practice.
Bridging regions
However, the ruling People’s Democratic Party patron, Mufti Muhammad Sayeed,
saw the darbar move as “a bridge between diverse regions of the Kashmir Valley and Jammu plains”.
“If the BJP is serious about bifurcating the offices, let it come up with a proposal.
Our party is for meeting the aspirations of the people of all the regions of the State,”
said Congress spokesman Ravinder Sharma.
Every year, over 7,000 employees of the civil secretariat shuttle between Srinagar and Jammu along with thousands of files, which are ferried in buses and trucks,
on the 300-km-long route.The move costs the State over ₹40 crore. The secretariat is located in Srinagar from May to October and in Jammu from November to April.
Questioned earlier
In January 1987, the then Prime Minister Rajiv Gandhi, stranded in the Kashmir Valley due to heavy snowfall, had asked the government “to review the age-old
practice”.
0 comments:
Post a Comment